The Trump administration has officially suspended the use of military aircraft for deportation and transfer flights, following reports highlighting inefficiencies and exorbitant costs. Initially launched in January 2025, these military flights were part of the administration’s strict stance on illegal immigration, aiming to transport migrants back to their home countries or to Guantanamo Bay. However, the operation faced significant hurdles, from skyrocketing expenses to diplomatic objections from several nations.
High Operational Costs of Military Deportation Flights
Military deportation flights proved to be far more expensive than traditional methods. Operating a C-17 military transport aircraft costs an estimated $28,500 per hour, while standard Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) flights range between $8,500 and $17,000 per hour. For example, deportation flights to India reportedly cost a whopping $3 million each.
Learn more about the cost breakdown of ICE flights here.
Diplomatic Strains Over Military Deportation Flights
The decision to use military aircraft for deportations created significant diplomatic challenges. Countries like Mexico and several Latin American nations denied U.S. military planes access to their airspace, which not only increased operational costs but also caused diplomatic tensions. A notable incident occurred when Colombian President Gustavo Petro blocked U.S. military planes carrying deported Colombian nationals from landing, citing concerns over deportee treatment and the use of military vessels. This sparked a temporary diplomatic standoff, with both countries threatening tariffs before reaching a resolution.
Read about the Colombia-U.S. diplomatic tensions and their resolution here.
What’s Next for U.S. Deportation Strategies?
As of March 1, 2025, the last military deportation flight took place, and no further flights are scheduled. U.S. officials indicate that this suspension may become permanent as the administration reconsiders its deportation strategies, focusing on alternative, cost-effective methods.
This development highlights the complexities of enforcing immigration policies, where the balance between effective enforcement, cost management, and maintaining diplomatic relations is increasingly challenging.
